bmad-template/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-test-review/resources/knowledge/pact-broker-webhooks.md

Pact Broker Webhooks (PactFlow → GitHub)

Principle

Configure PactFlow webhooks to trigger provider verification in GitHub Actions via a dedicated GitHub machine user, a long-lived classic Personal Access Token (PAT), and a PactFlow-stored secret. Monitor for silent webhook failures so an expired/revoked token does not quietly block deployments for days.

Rationale

Why webhooks matter

• PactFlow’s contract_requiring_verification_published webhook is the mechanism that notifies a provider repo (via repository_dispatch) that a consumer has published a contract needing verification.
• Without a working webhook, can-i-deploy in the consumer CI times out (900s) and eventually fails with There is no verified pact between <consumer-version> and the version of <provider> currently in <env> — even though nothing is wrong in either codebase.
• Webhook failures are silent by default: PactFlow keeps emitting requests, GitHub keeps returning 401 Unauthorized, but nothing alerts the team until a PR is blocked.

Why a dedicated GitHub machine user (not a personal PAT)

• Personal PATs die when the person leaves the company, rotates laptops, or revokes credentials during a security review. The contract test pipeline then breaks for reasons unrelated to any code change.
• A dedicated machine user (e.g., pactflow-<org>) is owned by the org, has only the repos it needs, and the PAT lifecycle is controlled by the security/platform team.
• GitHub billing does not count machine users added as outside collaborators to the specific repos they need — confirm with the org owner before assuming it’s free.

Why classic PAT with repo scope and no expiration

• PactFlow’s webhook calls the GitHub REST API’s repository_dispatch endpoint. This endpoint requires the repo scope on a classic PAT (fine-grained PATs work for many flows but have edge cases with repository_dispatch that are not universally supported at time of writing — verify with current GitHub docs).
• Classic PATs support “No expiration” — required to avoid the silent-failure trap every 90 days. GitHub warns against this for human users; for a locked-down machine-user PAT stored in PactFlow’s secret vault, the security trade-off is documented and accepted.
• The alternative — rotating a PAT every 30/60/90 days — requires tooling and coordination most teams don’t yet have. Long-lived + monitored + machine-user-owned is the pragmatic default.

Pattern Examples

Example 1: Webhook URL, Headers, and Body

{
  "description": "Notify <provider-repo> when a consumer contract requires verification",
  "events": [{ "name": "contract_requiring_verification_published" }],
  "provider": { "name": "<provider-pacticipant-name>" },
  "request": {
    "method": "POST",
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/<org>/<provider-repo>/dispatches",
    "headers": {
      "Accept": "application/vnd.github+json",
      "Authorization": "Bearer ${user.githubToken}",
      "Content-Type": "application/json",
      "User-Agent": "PactFlow",
      "X-GitHub-Api-Version": "2022-11-28"
    },
    "body": {
      "event_type": "contract_requiring_verification_published",
      "client_payload": {
        "pact_url": "${pactbroker.pactUrl}",
        "sha": "${pactbroker.providerVersionNumber}",
        "branch": "${pactbroker.providerVersionBranch}",
        "consumer_name": "${pactbroker.consumerName}",
        "consumer_version_number": "${pactbroker.consumerVersionNumber}",
        "consumer_version_tags": "${pactbroker.consumerVersionTags}",
        "consumer_version_branch": "${pactbroker.consumerVersionBranch}"
      }
    }
  }
}

Key Points:

• ${user.githubToken} references a PactFlow secret stored in Settings → Secrets (web UI: /settings/secrets). The secret holds the classic PAT — never inline the token in the webhook body.
• ${pactbroker.*} are PactFlow-injected template variables; the provider workflow reads them from github.event.client_payload.
• Use the contract_requiring_verification_published event (not contract_published) — the former fires only when a new pact content change needs verification; the latter fires on every publish, including no-op republishes.

Example 2: Provider GitHub Actions Workflow (Triggered by Webhook)

# .github/workflows/contract-test-provider.yml
name: contract-test-provider

on:
  repository_dispatch:
    types: [contract_requiring_verification_published]
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  verify:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    env:
      PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL }}
      PACT_BROKER_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PACT_BROKER_TOKEN }}
      # Pulled from webhook client_payload when triggered by PactFlow:
      PACT_PAYLOAD_URL: ${{ github.event.client_payload.pact_url }}
      GITHUB_SHA: ${{ github.event.client_payload.sha || github.sha }}
      GITHUB_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.client_payload.branch || github.head_ref || github.ref_name }}
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          # Check out the provider version known to the broker — this is the provider SHA PactFlow wants verified.
          ref: ${{ github.event.client_payload.sha || github.sha }}
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 20
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Run provider verification
        run: npm run test:pact:provider
      - name: Can I deploy provider?
        if: github.event_name == 'push'
        run: npm run can:i:deploy:provider

Key Points:

• repository_dispatch is the event type emitted by GitHub when the webhook’s REST call hits /repos/<org>/<repo>/dispatches.
• The types filter must match the webhook’s event_type (contract_requiring_verification_published here).
• Checking out the provider version known to the broker (providerVersionNumber) ensures verification runs against the exact provider commit PactFlow registered — not whatever is on main.
• PACT_PAYLOAD_URL makes buildVerifierOptions verify only the triggering pact (see pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md Example 1).

Example 3: Secret Rotation Runbook

Trigger: can-i-deploy in a consumer repo times out with There is no verified pact between <consumer-version> and the version of <provider> currently in <env> — AND the provider’s contract-test-provider workflow shows no recent repository_dispatch runs.

Diagnosis:

1. In PactFlow UI: Settings → Webhooks → <webhook-id> → Test. A 401 Unauthorized from GitHub confirms the token is dead.
2. In PactFlow UI: the webhook’s “Last executed at” is hours/days stale while consumer pacts are actively being published.

Rotation:

1. Log in to GitHub as the dedicated machine user (e.g., pactflow-<org>). Do not use a personal account — the whole point of the machine user is that the token outlives any individual.
2. Settings → Developer settings → Personal access tokens → Tokens (classic) → Generate new token (classic).
3. Configure the token:
   • Name: pactflow-webhook-<yyyy-mm-dd>
   • Expiration: No expiration (accepted trade-off for a locked-down machine-user token stored in PactFlow’s secret vault)
   • Scopes: repo (full repo scope is required by repository_dispatch; public_repo alone is insufficient for private repos)
4. Copy the new token value (shown only once).
5. In PactFlow UI: Settings → Secrets → <secret-name> (e.g., githubToken). Paste the new token into the value field and save. The webhook does not need to be edited — it references the secret by name via ${user.<secret-name>}.
6. Re-test the webhook: Settings → Webhooks → <webhook-id> → Test. Expect HTTP/1.1 204 No Content (GitHub’s success response for repository_dispatch).
7. In the provider repo: watch Actions → contract-test-provider for the newly dispatched run. Re-run the original consumer CI to confirm can-i-deploy now passes.
8. Revoke the old token: in the machine user’s GitHub settings, delete the previous pactflow-webhook-* token so a leaked copy can’t be reused.

Why no expiration: A token with a 90-day expiry rotates 4× per year. Each rotation is a silent-failure window if the runbook isn’t executed proactively. With monitoring (Example 4) + a locked-down machine-user-owned PAT that is only stored in PactFlow, long-lived is safer than short-lived-but-forgotten.

Example 4: Staleness Monitoring (Detect Silent Webhook Failures)

Goal: Alert the team if verification results haven’t been published for a pacticipant pair in the last N hours, so an expired PAT or network issue doesn’t silently block can-i-deploy for days.

Pick one of these (in increasing order of investment):

Option A — Daily sanity CI job (cheapest):

# .github/workflows/pact-staleness-check.yml
name: pact-staleness-check
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 9 * * 1-5' # weekdays 09:00 UTC
  workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
  check:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Fail if latest verification for <pair> is older than 24h
        env:
          PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.PACT_BROKER_BASE_URL }}
          PACT_BROKER_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PACT_BROKER_TOKEN }}
        run: |
          # Query broker matrix for newest verification timestamp for consumer/provider pair.
          # Exit 1 if > 24h old; team gets an email on the failed scheduled run.
          ./scripts/assert-recent-verification.sh <consumer> <provider> 86400

Option B — PactFlow metrics endpoint: Use the SmartBear MCP get_metrics / get_team_metrics tool (see pact-mcp.md) to surface verification freshness in a dashboard or Slack digest.

Option C — Webhook delivery log: PactFlow logs every webhook execution. Ship those logs to your SIEM / observability stack and alert on sustained 4xx responses from api.github.com.

Key Points:

• The point is not “which option you pick” — it’s that you pick at least one. Without monitoring, the first time you learn the webhook is dead is when a release is blocked.
• Alert threshold should match your consumer-publish cadence: if consumers publish daily, alert after 24–48h of silence; if hourly, after 3–6h.
• Keep the alert noise-free: page only on sustained staleness, not a single missed run.

Key Points

• Dedicated machine user owns the PAT — never a personal PAT. Name it pactflow-<org> or similar; give it outside-collaborator access only to the specific provider repos.
• Classic PAT, repo scope, no expiration — required for repository_dispatch. The “no expiration” trade-off is accepted in exchange for machine-user ownership + PactFlow-secret storage + staleness monitoring.
• Store the PAT as a PactFlow secret at /settings/secrets, reference it from the webhook via ${user.<secret-name>}. Never inline the token.
• Monitor for silence — at minimum, a daily scheduled CI job that asserts a recent verification timestamp exists for each critical consumer/provider pair.
• Rotation is a runbook, not an emergency — document it (see Example 3), keep it in the repo, and do a practice rotation once a year so it stays fresh.
• Symptom to remember: “consumer can-i-deploy timeout after 900s with There is no verified pact...” + “provider’s contract-test-provider workflow has no recent runs” = expired/revoked PAT. Start with Example 3.

Related Fragments

• pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md — how PACT_PAYLOAD_URL from the webhook’s client_payload.pact_url is consumed by buildVerifierOptions
• pact-consumer-framework-setup.md — consumer CI flow that issues can-i-deploy and silently times out when the webhook is dead
• pact-mcp.md — SmartBear MCP tools (Matrix, Metrics - All) useful for staleness monitoring dashboards
• contract-testing.md — foundational CDC patterns and resilience coverage

Anti-Patterns

Wrong: Using a human’s personal PAT

# ❌ PactFlow secret githubToken stores the lead engineer's personal classic PAT
# When they leave / rotate / revoke → all provider verifications stop silently

Right: Dedicated machine user owns the PAT

# ✅ Machine user `pactflow-<org>` generates the PAT; secret is owned by the org
# PAT lifecycle is decoupled from any individual's employment or laptop state

Wrong: No staleness monitoring

# ❌ No scheduled check for verification recency
# First signal that the webhook is dead: a blocked release PR, several days later

Right: Daily scheduled sanity check

# ✅ Scheduled workflow fails if latest verification > 24h old
# Team gets email alert on failed scheduled run → rotate PAT before anyone is blocked

Wrong: Short-expiration PAT with no rotation tooling

# ❌ 90-day expiry PAT, no calendar reminder, no runbook
# Breaks every 90 days for a day or two until someone notices

Right: No-expiration PAT on machine user + monitoring + documented runbook

# ✅ Long-lived PAT, scoped narrowly, stored in PactFlow, monitored for staleness
# Rotation is intentional (security review, suspected leak) not calendar-driven

Source: PactFlow webhook documentation, GitHub repository_dispatch REST API, seon-mcp-server / seon-admin-panel production incident April 2026